Care Carta

Stat Specialty Hospital del Rio

Del Rio, TX

Latest evaluation

Sep 28, 2026
Ruleset catalog v2
95% of the 20 checks Care Carta could make passed
19 passed
1 failed
0 blocked
12 couldn't determine
1 not assessed
0 not applicable

Hospital and file facts

Type 2 NPI
Not available
CCN
Not available
Current MRF
253.8 KB · CSV
Last observed file change
Sep 28, 2026

Transparency checks

45 CFR Part 180 — Hospital Price TransparencyLatest evaluation: Sep 28, 2026
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible officialPassed
§180.50(a)(3)(iii)MRF correctly encodes the accuracy and completeness attestationPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iv)MRF correctly encodes the attester's namePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(i)(A)MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPICouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta's reference data lacks a value needed for this check, such as the hospital's NPI.

CareCarta's facility reference has no Type 2 NPI to compare.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)(B)MRF correctly encodes its template version and update datePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges9 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a gross charge for every item and serviceCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "CareCarta parsed the whole MRF".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a discounted cash price for every item and service that has oneCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "CareCarta parsed the whole MRF".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified minimum negotiated chargeCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not tell whether this requirement applies to this file.

No structural deficiency was reported, but the applicable record population has not been classified; no pass or not-applicable inference was made.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified maximum negotiated chargeCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not tell whether this requirement applies to this file.

No structural deficiency was reported, but the applicable record population has not been classified; no pass or not-applicable inference was made.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)-(C)Payer-specific negotiated charge5 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)MRF correctly encodes payer and plan namesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(B)MRF correctly encodes how each charge was establishedPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Rate expression and methodology5 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)MRF expresses each negotiated rate as a dollar amount, percentage, or algorithmPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iii) or §180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Percentage and algorithm rates give enough information to derive a dollar amountCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "CareCarta parsed the whole MRF".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)Allowed-amount statistics4 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 10th percentile allowed amountCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "The MRF has percentage or algorithm rates".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the median allowed amountCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "The MRF has percentage or algorithm rates".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 90th percentile allowed amountCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "The MRF has percentage or algorithm rates".

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the count of allowed amountsCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "The MRF has percentage or algorithm rates".

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(A)MRF correctly encodes each item or service descriptionPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(B)MRF correctly encodes the inpatient or outpatient settingPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(C)MRF correctly encodes drug units and measurement typeCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not tell whether this requirement applies to this file.

No structural deficiency was reported, but the applicable record population has not been classified; no pass or not-applicable inference was made.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(A)-(B)MRF correctly encodes billing codes and code typesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(C)MRF lists every applicable modifier and its chargesCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta could not read the hospital's file, and the CMS validator did not find it invalid.

This check could not be made because an earlier check could not be determined: "CareCarta parsed the whole MRF".

§180.50(c)(2)CMS file formatPassed
§180.50(c)(2)MRF passes the CMS validator without errorsPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility1 failed
§180.50(d)(3)(i)MRF downloads without paymentPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without payment.

§180.50(d)(3)(ii)MRF downloads without an account or passwordPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without an account or password.

§180.50(d)(3)(iii)MRF downloads without submitting personal informationPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without submitting personally identifiable information.

§180.50(d)(3)(iv)MRF downloads to an automated clientPassed

An automated HTTP client downloaded the declared MRF successfully.

§180.50(d)(4)MRF is a CSV or JSON file, optionally compressedPassed

The downloaded artifact provides CSV that can be processed as structured text.

§180.50(d)(5)MRF file name follows the CMS conventionPassed

The published file name 993730995_HorizonDelRioLLC_standardcharges.csv matches the required identifier, hospital-name, and standardcharges structure.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt is published and uses the required fieldsFailed

The cms-hpt.txt file has 1 strict-format issue.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt links this hospital's MRFPassed

The cms-hpt.txt entry "STAT Specialty Hospital – Del Rio" links this hospital's MRF (https://statspecialtyhospital.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/993730995_HorizonDelRioLLC_standardcharges.csv).

§180.50(d)(6)(ii)Homepage has a link labelled Price TransparencyPassed

A labeled Price Transparency link (https://statspecialtyhospital.com/price-transparency) was observed in the acquired hospital homepage HTML.

§180.50(e)Update frequencyPassed
§180.50(e)MRF was updated within the past 12 monthsPassed

The MRF reports 3/6/2026, within one year of this audit observation.

§180.60Shoppable services disclosureNot assessed
§180.60(a)(1) or §180.60(a)(2)Website offers a qualifying shoppable-services list or price estimatorNot assessed

Why: CareCarta has not built this check yet.

CareCarta has not built an evaluator for the shoppable-services disclosure (45 CFR 180.60) yet, so this check cannot be decided.

History

Audit history
Select a historical cell to inspect that day's checks below.
Sep 27
Sep 28
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible official
§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service information
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding information
§180.50(c)(2)CMS file format
§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility
§180.50(e)Update frequency
§180.60Shoppable services disclosure
PassedFailedBlocked — an earlier check failedNot applicableCouldn't determine

Official CMS enforcement record

CMS enforcement records were not evaluated in this bounded audit.

Hospital response

No hospital response is recorded for this bounded audit.