Silver Lake Hospital LTACH
Latest evaluation
Hospital and file facts
Transparency checks
Attestation and responsible officialPassed
MRF correctly encodes the accuracy and completeness attestationPassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
MRF correctly encodes the attester's namePassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
Hospital and MRF informationPassed
MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPIPassed
The MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPI 1104144641.
MRF correctly encodes its template version and update datePassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
Standard charges6 failed
MRF lists a gross charge for every item and serviceNot assessed
Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.
Gross charge values are populated on 117,955 rows and blank on 0 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.
MRF lists a discounted cash price for every item and service that has oneNot assessed
Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.
Discounted cash price values are populated on 62 rows and blank on 117,893 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.
MRF correctly encodes the de-identified minimum negotiated chargeNot applicable
No dollar-denominated payer rates were found across 117,955 parsed records.
MRF correctly encodes the de-identified maximum negotiated chargeNot applicable
No dollar-denominated payer rates were found across 117,955 parsed records.
Payer-specific negotiated charge6 failed
MRF correctly encodes payer and plan namesPassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
MRF correctly encodes how each charge was establishedFailed
If the "standard charge methodology" encoded value is "other", there must be a corresponding explanation found in the "additional notes" for the associated payer-specific negotiated charge (reported 18 times).
Rate expression and methodology5 failed
MRF expresses each negotiated rate as a dollar amount, percentage, or algorithmFailed
If a payer name and plan name are encoded, a payer-specific charge must also be encoded (reported 29,061 times).
Percentage and algorithm rates give enough information to derive a dollar amountCouldn't determine
Why: This needs a person to judge; the automated check cannot decide it.
88,894 percentage- or algorithm-based payer rates require semantic review of whether a reasonable user can derive a dollar amount.
Allowed-amount statistics4 failed
MRF correctly encodes the 10th percentile allowed amountFailed
If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "10th Percentile" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
MRF correctly encodes the median allowed amountFailed
If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "Median Amount" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
MRF correctly encodes the 90th percentile allowed amountFailed
If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "90th Percentile" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
MRF correctly encodes the count of allowed amountsFailed
If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, then a corresponding "Count of Allowed Amounts" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
Item and service information1 failed
MRF correctly encodes each item or service descriptionPassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
MRF correctly encodes the inpatient or outpatient settingPassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
MRF correctly encodes drug units and measurement typeFailed
- "drug_type_of_measurement" value "tablet" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 62 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "mg" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "tube" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "ae" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "drop" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times).
Billing and coding informationPassed
MRF correctly encodes billing codes and code typesPassed
The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.
MRF lists every applicable modifier and its chargesNot assessed
Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.
The MRF was parsed for encoded modifiers, but the file alone cannot establish whether every applicable modifier-specific charge is represented.
CMS file format1 failed
MRF passes the CMS validator without errorsFailed
- If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, then a corresponding "Count of Allowed Amounts" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
- If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "Median Amount" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
- If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "10th Percentile" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times).
- If a "payer specific negotiated charge" is expressed as a percentage or algorithm, and count of allowed amounts is not zero, then a corresponding "90th Percentile" must also be encoded (reported 29,994 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "tablet" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 62 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "mg" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). (reported 2 times)
- If a payer name and plan name are encoded, a payer-specific charge must also be encoded (reported 29,061 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "tube" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "ae" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- You must encode one of these valid values: GR, ME, ML, UN, F2, EA, GM (reported 31 times). "drug_type_of_measurement" value "drop" is not one of the allowed valid values.
- If the "standard charge methodology" encoded value is "other", there must be a corresponding explanation found in the "additional notes" for the associated payer-specific negotiated charge (reported 18 times). "standard_charge|min" value "$3,000.00" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 6 times). "standard_charge|max" value "$3,000.00" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 12 times). "standard_charge|min" value "$2,500.00" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 95 times). "standard_charge|max" value "$5,000.00" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 89 times). "standard_charge|min" value "Self" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 4 times). "standard_charge|max" value "Self" is not a positive number.
- You must encode a positive, non-zero, numeric value (reported 4 times).
Publication and accessibilityPassed
MRF downloads without paymentPassed
CareCarta retrieved the file without payment.
MRF downloads without an account or passwordPassed
CareCarta retrieved the file without an account or password.
MRF downloads without submitting personal informationPassed
CareCarta retrieved the file without submitting personally identifiable information.
MRF downloads to an automated clientPassed
An automated HTTP client downloaded the declared MRF successfully.
MRF is a CSV or JSON file, optionally compressedPassed
The downloaded artifact provides CSV that can be processed as structured text.
MRF file name follows the CMS conventionPassed
The published file name 272315199-1104144641_silver-lake-hospital_standardcharges.csv matches the required identifier, hospital-name, and standardcharges structure.
cms-hpt.txt is published and uses the required fieldsPassed
The cms-hpt.txt file uses the required canonical fields and valid values.
cms-hpt.txt links this hospital's MRFPassed
The cms-hpt.txt entry "Silver Lake Hospital LTACH" links an MRF (https://www.silverlakehospital.org/price-transparency/272315199-1104144641_silver-lake-hospital_standardcharges.csv) that declares this hospital's Type 2 NPI.
Homepage has a link labelled Price TransparencyPassed
A labeled Price Transparency link (https://www.silverlakehospital.org/price-transparency) was observed in the acquired hospital homepage HTML.
Update frequencyPassed
MRF was updated within the past 12 monthsPassed
The MRF reports 7/13/2026, within one year of this audit observation.
Shoppable services disclosureNot assessed
Website offers a qualifying shoppable-services list or price estimatorNot assessed
Why: CareCarta has not built this check yet.
CareCarta has not built an evaluator for the shoppable-services disclosure (45 CFR 180.60) yet, so this check cannot be decided.