Care Carta

Elliot Hospital

Manchester, NH

Price file 1 of 2: download.aspx

Latest evaluation

Sep 28, 2026
Ruleset catalog v2
96% of the 27 checks Care Carta could make passed
26 passed
1 failed
0 blocked
2 couldn't determine
4 not assessed
0 not applicable

Hospital and file facts

Type 2 NPI
Not available
CCN
300012
Current MRF
43.0 MB · JSON
Last observed file change
Sep 27, 2026

Transparency checks

45 CFR Part 180 — Hospital Price TransparencyLatest evaluation: Sep 28, 2026
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible officialPassed
§180.50(a)(3)(iii)MRF correctly encodes the accuracy and completeness attestationPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iv)MRF correctly encodes the attester's namePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(i)(A)MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPICouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta's reference data lacks a value needed for this check, such as the hospital's NPI.

CareCarta's facility reference has no Type 2 NPI to compare.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)(B)MRF correctly encodes its template version and update datePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a gross charge for every item and serviceNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Gross charge values are populated on 14,592 charge objects and blank on 11,439 charge objects. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a discounted cash price for every item and service that has oneNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Discounted cash price values are populated on 14,592 charge objects and blank on 11,439 charge objects. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified minimum negotiated chargePassed

No structural deficiency was reported across 132,138 dollar-denominated payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified maximum negotiated chargePassed

No structural deficiency was reported across 132,138 dollar-denominated payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)-(C)Payer-specific negotiated charge1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)MRF correctly encodes payer and plan namesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(B)MRF correctly encodes how each charge was establishedPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Rate expression and methodology1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)MRF expresses each negotiated rate as a dollar amount, percentage, or algorithmPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iii) or §180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Percentage and algorithm rates give enough information to derive a dollar amountCouldn't determine

Why: This needs a person to judge; the automated check cannot decide it.

39,733 percentage- or algorithm-based payer rates require semantic review of whether a reasonable user can derive a dollar amount.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)Allowed-amount statisticsPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 10th percentile allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 6,283 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the median allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 6,283 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 90th percentile allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 6,283 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the count of allowed amountsPassed

The count field passed structural validation for 39,733 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service informationPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(A)MRF correctly encodes each item or service descriptionPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(B)MRF correctly encodes the inpatient or outpatient settingPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(C)MRF correctly encodes drug units and measurement typePassed

No drug-unit deficiency was reported across 8,786 NDC-coded records.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding informationPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(A)-(B)MRF correctly encodes billing codes and code typesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(C)MRF lists every applicable modifier and its chargesNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

The MRF was parsed for encoded modifiers, but the file alone cannot establish whether every applicable modifier-specific charge is represented.

§180.50(c)(2)CMS file formatPassed
§180.50(c)(2)MRF passes the CMS validator without errorsPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility1 failed
§180.50(d)(3)(i)MRF downloads without paymentPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without payment.

§180.50(d)(3)(ii)MRF downloads without an account or passwordPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without an account or password.

§180.50(d)(3)(iii)MRF downloads without submitting personal informationPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without submitting personally identifiable information.

§180.50(d)(3)(iv)MRF downloads to an automated clientPassed

An automated HTTP client downloaded the declared MRF successfully.

§180.50(d)(4)MRF is a CSV or JSON file, optionally compressedPassed

The downloaded artifact provides JSON that can be processed as structured text.

§180.50(d)(5)MRF file name follows the CMS conventionFailed

The published file name download.aspx does not match the required standardcharges file name structure.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt is published and uses the required fieldsPassed

The cms-hpt.txt file uses the required canonical fields and valid values.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt links this hospital's MRFPassed

The cms-hpt.txt file declares one MRF (https://hospitalpricedisclosure.com/download.aspx?pi=f7iBAjlzov5McTIGaTxPpw*-*), so it is this hospital's.

§180.50(d)(6)(ii)Homepage has a link labelled Price TransparencyPassed

A labeled Price Transparency link (https://www.elliothospital.org/patients-and-visitors/patient-information/estimates) was observed in the acquired hospital homepage HTML.

§180.50(e)Update frequencyPassed
§180.50(e)MRF was updated within the past 12 monthsPassed

The MRF reports 2026-04-01, within one year of this audit observation.

§180.60Shoppable services disclosureNot assessed
§180.60(a)(1) or §180.60(a)(2)Website offers a qualifying shoppable-services list or price estimatorNot assessed

Why: CareCarta has not built this check yet.

CareCarta has not built an evaluator for the shoppable-services disclosure (45 CFR 180.60) yet, so this check cannot be decided.

Price file 2 of 2: 02-0369797_northeast-rehabilitation-hospital_standardcharges_portsmouth.csv

This price file also covers 1 other hospital.

Latest evaluation

Sep 28, 2026
Ruleset catalog v2
96% of the 25 checks Care Carta could make passed
24 passed
1 failed
0 blocked
4 couldn't determine
4 not assessed
0 not applicable

Hospital and file facts

Type 2 NPI
Not available
CCN
300012
Current MRF
8.2 MB · CSV
Last observed file change
Sep 27, 2026

Transparency checks

45 CFR Part 180 — Hospital Price TransparencyLatest evaluation: Sep 28, 2026
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible officialPassed
§180.50(a)(3)(iii)MRF correctly encodes the accuracy and completeness attestationPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iv)MRF correctly encodes the attester's namePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(i)(A)MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPICouldn't determine

Why: This check was made for another hospital that shares this price file.

Several hospitals share this price file. The NPI it declares was checked against another hospital the file covers, so it was not checked for this one.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)(B)MRF correctly encodes its template version and update datePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a gross charge for every item and serviceNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Gross charge values are populated on 5,620 rows and blank on 29,757 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a discounted cash price for every item and service that has oneNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Discounted cash price values are populated on 5,620 rows and blank on 29,757 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified minimum negotiated chargePassed

No structural deficiency was reported across 13,224 dollar-denominated payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified maximum negotiated chargePassed

No structural deficiency was reported across 13,224 dollar-denominated payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)-(C)Payer-specific negotiated charge1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)MRF correctly encodes payer and plan namesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(B)MRF correctly encodes how each charge was establishedPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Rate expression and methodology1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)MRF expresses each negotiated rate as a dollar amount, percentage, or algorithmPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(a)(3)(iii) or §180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Percentage and algorithm rates give enough information to derive a dollar amountCouldn't determine

Why: This needs a person to judge; the automated check cannot decide it.

16,155 percentage- or algorithm-based payer rates require semantic review of whether a reasonable user can derive a dollar amount.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)Allowed-amount statisticsPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 10th percentile allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 157 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the median allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 157 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 90th percentile allowed amountPassed

The field passed structural validation for 157 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the count of allowed amountsPassed

The count field passed structural validation for 16,155 applicable payer-rate records.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service informationPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(A)MRF correctly encodes each item or service descriptionPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(B)MRF correctly encodes the inpatient or outpatient settingPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(C)MRF correctly encodes drug units and measurement typePassed

No drug-unit deficiency was reported across 2,044 NDC-coded records.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding informationPassed
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(A)-(B)MRF correctly encodes billing codes and code typesPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(C)MRF lists every applicable modifier and its chargesNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

The MRF was parsed for encoded modifiers, but the file alone cannot establish whether every applicable modifier-specific charge is represented.

§180.50(c)(2)CMS file formatPassed
§180.50(c)(2)MRF passes the CMS validator without errorsPassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility1 failed
§180.50(d)(3)(i)MRF downloads without paymentPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without payment.

§180.50(d)(3)(ii)MRF downloads without an account or passwordPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without an account or password.

§180.50(d)(3)(iii)MRF downloads without submitting personal informationPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without submitting personally identifiable information.

§180.50(d)(3)(iv)MRF downloads to an automated clientPassed

An automated HTTP client downloaded the declared MRF successfully.

§180.50(d)(4)MRF is a CSV or JSON file, optionally compressedPassed

The downloaded artifact provides CSV that can be processed as structured text.

§180.50(d)(5)MRF file name follows the CMS conventionFailed

The published file name 02-0369797_northeast-rehabilitation-hospital_standardcharges_portsmouth.csv does not match the required standardcharges file name structure.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt is published and uses the required fieldsCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta does not have an address for this hospital's source.

No cms-hpt.txt URL was supplied to this audit run.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt links this hospital's MRFCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta does not have an address for this hospital's source.

No cms-hpt.txt URL was supplied to this audit run.

§180.50(d)(6)(ii)Homepage has a link labelled Price TransparencyPassed

A labeled Price Transparency link (https://www.northeastrehab.com/faqs/our-networks-standard-charges/) was observed in the acquired hospital homepage HTML.

§180.50(e)Update frequencyPassed
§180.50(e)MRF was updated within the past 12 monthsPassed

The MRF reports 4/1/2026, within one year of this audit observation.

§180.60Shoppable services disclosureNot assessed
§180.60(a)(1) or §180.60(a)(2)Website offers a qualifying shoppable-services list or price estimatorNot assessed

Why: CareCarta has not built this check yet.

CareCarta has not built an evaluator for the shoppable-services disclosure (45 CFR 180.60) yet, so this check cannot be decided.

History

Audit history
Select a historical cell to inspect that day's checks below.
Sep 27
Sep 28
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible official
§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service information
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding information
§180.50(c)(2)CMS file format
§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility
§180.50(e)Update frequency
§180.60Shoppable services disclosure
PassedFailedBlocked — an earlier check failedNot applicableCouldn't determine

Official CMS enforcement record

CMS enforcement records were not evaluated in this bounded audit.

Hospital response

No hospital response is recorded for this bounded audit.