Care Carta

Kedren Community Mental Health Center

Los Angeles, CA
Official transparency page ↗Current MRF ↗View as JSON

Latest evaluation

Sep 28, 2026
Ruleset catalog v2
50% of the 18 checks Care Carta could make passed
9 passed
3 failed
6 blocked
3 couldn't determine
4 not assessed
8 not applicable

What do these results mean?

Hospital and file facts

Type 2 NPI
Not available
CCN
054083
Current MRF
297.4 KB · CSV
Last observed file change
Sep 27, 2026

Transparency checks

45 CFR Part 180 — Hospital Price TransparencyLatest evaluation: Sep 28, 2026
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible official2 failed
§180.50(a)(3)(iii)MRF correctly encodes the accuracy and completeness attestationFailed
  • Header column "To the best of its knowledge and belief, this hospital has…" is miscoded or missing.

Each header listed must be included and encoded as the CMS data dictionary specifies.

§180.50(a)(3)(iv)MRF correctly encodes the attester's nameFailed
  • Header column "attester_name" is miscoded or missing.

Each header listed must be included and encoded as the CMS data dictionary specifies.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information1 couldn't be determined
§180.50(b)(2)(i)(A)MRF declares this hospital's Type 2 NPICouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta's reference data lacks a value needed for this check, such as the hospital's NPI.

CareCarta's facility reference has no Type 2 NPI to compare.

§180.50(b)(2)(i)(B)MRF correctly encodes its template version and update datePassed

The completed structural evaluation reported no deficiency for this nonconditional check.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges3 blocked
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a gross charge for every item and serviceNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Gross charge values are populated on 1,524 rows and blank on 0 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF lists a discounted cash price for every item and service that has oneNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

Discounted cash price values are populated on 1,524 rows and blank on 0 rows. The MRF alone cannot prove that every applicable hospital item or service is represented.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified minimum negotiated chargeNot applicable

No dollar-denominated payer rates were found across 1,524 parsed records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)MRF correctly encodes the de-identified maximum negotiated chargeNot applicable

No dollar-denominated payer rates were found across 1,524 parsed records.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)-(C)Payer-specific negotiated charge3 blocked
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(A)MRF correctly encodes payer and plan namesBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(B)MRF correctly encodes how each charge was establishedBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Rate expression and methodology1 blocked
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)MRF expresses each negotiated rate as a dollar amount, percentage, or algorithmBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(a)(3)(iii) or §180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)Percentage and algorithm rates give enough information to derive a dollar amountNot applicable

The upstream applicability condition was conclusively absent.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)Allowed-amount statisticsNot applicable
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 10th percentile allowed amountNot applicable

The upstream applicability condition was conclusively absent.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the median allowed amountNot applicable

The upstream applicability condition was conclusively absent.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the 90th percentile allowed amountNot applicable

The upstream applicability condition was conclusively absent.

§180.50(b)(2)(ii)(C)(2)MRF correctly encodes the count of allowed amountsNot applicable

The upstream applicability condition was conclusively absent.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service information2 blocked
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(A)MRF correctly encodes each item or service descriptionBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(B)MRF correctly encodes the inpatient or outpatient settingBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(b)(2)(iii)(C)MRF correctly encodes drug units and measurement typeNot applicable

No NDC-coded records were found across 1,524 parsed records.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding information1 blocked
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(A)-(B)MRF correctly encodes billing codes and code typesBlocked

Blocked because this check failed: MRF passes the CMS validator without errors

The CMS validator found errors in the file's header rows and did not check the charge rows, so this check could not be evaluated. This is not a separate failure.

§180.50(b)(2)(iv)(C)MRF lists every applicable modifier and its chargesNot assessed

Why: The price file alone cannot answer this; it needs evidence from outside the file.

The MRF was parsed for encoded modifiers, but the file alone cannot establish whether every applicable modifier-specific charge is represented.

§180.50(c)(2)CMS file format1 failed
§180.50(c)(2)MRF passes the CMS validator without errorsFailed
  • Header column "location_name" is miscoded or missing.
  • Header column "type_2_npi" is miscoded or missing.
  • Header column "To the best of its knowledge and belief, this hospital has…" is miscoded or missing.
  • Header column "attester_name" is miscoded or missing.
  • Column median_amount is miscoded or missing from row 3.
  • You must include this column and confirm that it is encoded as specified in the data dictionary. (reported 4 times)
  • Column 10th_percentile is miscoded or missing from row 3.
  • Column 90th_percentile is miscoded or missing from row 3.
  • Column count is miscoded or missing from row 3.
  • Errors were found in the headers in row 3, so the remaining rows were not evaluated.

Each header listed must be included and encoded as the CMS data dictionary specifies.

§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility2 couldn't be determined
§180.50(d)(3)(i)MRF downloads without paymentPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without payment.

§180.50(d)(3)(ii)MRF downloads without an account or passwordPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without an account or password.

§180.50(d)(3)(iii)MRF downloads without submitting personal informationPassed

CareCarta retrieved the file without submitting personally identifiable information.

§180.50(d)(3)(iv)MRF downloads to an automated clientPassed

An automated HTTP client downloaded the declared MRF successfully.

§180.50(d)(4)MRF is a CSV or JSON file, optionally compressedPassed

The downloaded artifact provides CSV that can be processed as structured text.

§180.50(d)(5)MRF file name follows the CMS conventionPassed

The published file name 95-2459796_kedren_health_standardcharges.csv matches the required identifier, hospital-name, and standardcharges structure.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt is published and uses the required fieldsCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta does not have an address for this hospital's source.

No cms-hpt.txt URL was supplied to this audit run.

§180.50(d)(6)(i)cms-hpt.txt links this hospital's MRFCouldn't determine

Why: CareCarta does not have an address for this hospital's source.

No cms-hpt.txt URL was supplied to this audit run.

§180.50(d)(6)(ii)Homepage has a link labelled Price TransparencyPassed

A labeled Price Transparency link (https://www.kedren.org/hospital-price-transparency/) was observed in the acquired hospital homepage HTML.

§180.50(e)Update frequencyPassed
§180.50(e)MRF was updated within the past 12 monthsPassed

The MRF reports 06/02/2026, within one year of this audit observation.

§180.60Shoppable services disclosureNot assessed
§180.60(a)(1) or §180.60(a)(2)Website offers a qualifying shoppable-services list or price estimatorNot assessed

Why: CareCarta has not built this check yet.

CareCarta has not built an evaluator for the shoppable-services disclosure (45 CFR 180.60) yet, so this check cannot be decided.

History

Audit history
Select a historical cell to inspect that day's checks below.
Sep 27
Sep 28
§180.50(a)(3)Attestation and responsible official
§180.50(b)(2)(i)Hospital and MRF information
§180.50(b)(2)(ii)Standard charges
§180.50(b)(2)(iii)Item and service information
§180.50(b)(2)(iv)Billing and coding information
§180.50(c)(2)CMS file format
§180.50(d)(1)-(6)Publication and accessibility
§180.50(e)Update frequency
§180.60Shoppable services disclosure
PassedFailedBlocked — an earlier check failedNot applicableCouldn't determine

Official CMS enforcement record

CMS enforcement records were not evaluated in this bounded audit.

Hospital response

No hospital response is recorded for this bounded audit.