Care Carta

Vermont

Hospitals in Vermont

Hospitals
16
Price file checked
15
No price file found
1
Results as of
Oct 5, 2026

How Vermont compares

Vermont: 83%
Vermont's score is placed 15th out of 52 states and territories

0510152045–50%: 1 state (Puerto Rico)50–55%: 1 state (South Dakota)55–60%: 0 states60–65%: 1 state (Maryland)65–70%: 4 states (New York, Arizona, New Hampshire, Massachusetts)70–75%: 10 states (Hawaii, Florida, Connecticut, Nevada, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Mississippi, Virginia, North Carolina)75–80%: 10 states (Pennsylvania, Georgia, Utah, Minnesota, Wyoming, Ohio, Arkansas, West Virginia, District of Columbia, Tennessee)80–85%: 17 states (New Mexico, Iowa, Illinois, South Carolina, California, Oregon, Vermont, Idaho, Maine, Alabama, Kansas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Montana, Texas, Missouri, Kentucky)Vermont 83%85–90%: 6 states (Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Oklahoma, North Dakota)90–95%: 2 states (Rhode Island, Washington)95–100%: 0 states50%60%70%80%90%100%
Understand this chart

The score. Each hospital gets a pass rate: the share of Care Carta's checks it passed, counting only the checks we could run. A hospital with no usable price file gets 0%. A state's score is the average of its hospitals' pass rates. Only hospitals on Medicare's list count.

The chart. Each bar is a group of states with similar scores, in steps of 5 points (for example, 70–75%). The taller the bar, the more states in that group. Vermont's bar is blue.

Small places. States and territories with fewer than 10 hospitals aren't charted or ranked, because a single hospital would swing their score. They're in the list below.

All states and territories
StateScoreHospitals counted
Rhode Island93%15
Washington91%102
Alaska87%16
Colorado87%108
Delaware87%16
Indiana85%163
Oklahoma85%142
North Dakota85%48
New Mexico84%48
Iowa84%120
Illinois84%201
South Carolina84%84
California84%402
Oregon84%61
Vermont83%16
Idaho83%53
Maine82%36
Alabama82%110
Kansas82%147
Wisconsin81%152
Nebraska81%95
Montana81%62
Texas80%576
Missouri80%132
Kentucky80%119
Pennsylvania79%214
Georgia79%167
Utah79%56
Minnesota78%135
Wyoming78%30
Ohio77%221
Arkansas77%105
West Virginia76%60
District of Columbia75%12
Tennessee75%139
Hawaii74%24
Florida74%277
Connecticut74%39
Nevada74%53
Louisiana73%200
Michigan72%161
New Jersey72%93
Mississippi71%110
Virginia71%107
North Carolina71%124
New York69%187
Arizona69%118
New Hampshire68%29
Massachusetts66%95
Maryland61%58
South Dakota50%59
U.S. Virgin Islands50%2 *
Puerto Rico48%61
American Samoa4%1 *
Guam0%1 *
Northern Mariana Islands0%1 *

* Fewer than 10 hospitals counted: one hospital moves the score a lot, so it is not charted or ranked.

By section of the rule

SectionPassedFailedBlockedCouldn't determine
§180.50(a)(3) Attestation and responsible official87%7%7%0%
§180.50(b)(2)(i) Hospital and MRF information87%0%7%7%
§180.50(b)(2)(ii) Standard charges33%7%7%53%
§180.50(b)(2)(iii) Item and service information87%0%13%0%
§180.50(b)(2)(iv) Billing and coding information87%0%13%0%
§180.50(c)(2) CMS file format87%7%7%0%
§180.50(d)(1)-(6) Publication and accessibility73%13%0%13%
§180.50(e) Update frequency87%7%7%0%
Understand this table

Each row is one part of the federal price transparency rule. The percentages show how the 15 hospitals whose price file Care Carta checked did on that part, using each hospital's latest results.

Blocked means we couldn't check that part, because an earlier check it depends on failed. Couldn't determine means we tried but couldn't decide, often for a reason on our side; it's never counted against the hospital. What the results mean.

Hospitals

Cities